IA em 2026

Das respostas à ação: como será a IA em 2026

Tecnologia   |   Joshua Burkhow   |   5 de fevereiro de 2026 TEMPO DE LEITURA: 4 MINUTOS
TEMPO DE LEITURA: 4 MINUTOS

Sou fã de começar o ano com energia, e nada melhor do que lançar um podcast para dar o pontapé inicial. Como diz o ditado: ou vai com tudo ou nem tenta?

In taking on this podcast as the host going forward, I wanted to take the conversations with topics like AI to a more in depth and tangible feeling place. I’m incredibly passionate about this topic and my goal is  to hold deep, useful conversations about where AI is headed and what it means for the folks who try to make it work every day, which I call the Future of Work.

Para iniciar essa jornada, conversei com duas lideranças que trazem perspectivas valiosas sobre IA: Patrick McGarry, Diretor Federal de Dados da ServiceNow, e Dr. Jupiter Bakakeu, Especialista Líder em IA Generativa da Alteryx.Eles não falam apenas de teoria. Estão na linha de frente, desenvolvendo soluções e refletindo sobre como a IA realmente opera, com clareza sobre os desafios e as exigências do mundo real.

To get a taste of where this amazing conversation went, take a look at these 5 ideas from this episode that I think will shape the AI conversation this year:

1. Agentes mudam as regras do jogo

AI agents are moving away from the perception of just being smart assistants to shifting the entire landscape of how teams are formed and work is done.

Jupiter broke it down like this: Real agents don’t just generate answers; they perceive, plan, act, and learn. Once they start taking real-world actions (like modifying records or triggering workflows), the stakes go up. Fast.

I think Patrick nailed it: ”The moment AI can take action, you have to care about governance. Mistakes aren’t just wrong answers anymore. They’re real outcomes.”

This is where a lot of the hype falls apart. Cool demos don’t mean a system is safe, auditable, or even reversible.

2. Delegar com critério

Everyone’s excited about delegation, and for good reason, AI agents can be powerful teammates.

But just handing off everything is a sure way for disaster.

I loved Jupiter’s framework on this point: Look for tasks that are repeatable, reversible, and auditable. If it meets all three, go ahead and delegate. If not? Keep a human in the loop.

Exemplos:

  • Organizar arquivos ou classificar documentos
  • Agendar reuniões ou resumir relatórios
  • Tomada de decisões financeiras
  • Envio de declarações fiscais

Bottom line: Just because an agent can do something doesn’t mean it should. We need to be thoughtful about this part!

3. Voice is rising, but it’s not the end of the UI

We talked a lot about voice. Honestly? I’m bullish on it, especially for consumer use cases.

Voice lowers friction. It makes delegation feel more natural. And when it works, it feels like magic. But enterprise use cases? I’m willing to admit, that’s a taller order.

Patrick made a great point: ”Voice may feel natural, but governance needs the receipts.” When you’re working on regulated tasks or precision-heavy workflows, clicking a button is still safer than hoping an AI caught your meaning.

Jupiter was on the same page: “Voice should augment your interface, not replace it.”

Na rodada final de perguntas do episódio, ambos concordaram que a voz continuará evoluindo. Ainda assim, a digitação ainda seguirá predominante. Por agora, vou ficar do outro lado conversando com meu computador!

4. Os principais bloqueadores não são técnicos

One of the biggest myths in AI right now is that model quality is the bottleneck. It’s just not the case.

The real blockers are trust and cost.

We’re talking massive infrastructure needs and  there’s a reason compute costs are exploding. Then layer on global regulations like the EU AI Act, amongst many others in flight, and you’ll understand what real constraints look like. AI won’t move forward with out a level of trust and a lower bill.

This makes tangible sense because guardrails matter. But it’s important to recognize that the path to scalable AI runs through modernization, governance, and data quality, not just cooler models.

Patrick summed it up wisely: ”The winners in 2026 won’t chase every new feature. They’ll be boringly compliant and quietly effective.”

Concordo plenamente.

5. A melhor IA é invisível

One nugget of wisdom came up a few times: The most impactful AI might be the stuff we don’t even notice.

Jupiter compartilhou um exemplo simples e poderoso. Ele criou um agente em segundo plano que limpa e classifica todo o seu Google Drive durante a noite, todos os dias. Sem alardes ou tarefas extras. Apenas trabalho concluído, de forma contínua e confiável.

That’s the bar we should be aiming for. AI that fits into your life or workflow quietly doing what needs to be done, without creating new risks.

Pode parecer pouco disruptivo à primeira vista. Não é. Um conjunto crescente de melhorias incrementais, aplicado com consistência, gera impacto significativo ao longo do tempo.

We’re past the phase where AI is the shiny new toy. We’re in the phase where people are seeing the way forward and becoming strategic and deliberate about the path.

That shift from answers to action is what 2026 is all about.

Listen to the full episode here: 🎧 Alter Everything Podcast: What Does AI Look Like in 2026?

Compartilhe sua opinião nos comentários ou envie um e-mail para [e-mail protegido].

Tags